CO-15 CO · Contractual Obligation

CO-15 Denial Code: Authorization number is missing, wrong, or doesn't fit the claim

An authorization is required, but the auth number on the claim is missing, wrong, expired, or doesn't match the services or provider billed. Distinct from CO-197 (no auth at all) - here the auth number itself is the problem.

Group code
CO - Contractual Obligation
Code type
CARC
Billable to patient?
No - correct and resubmit
Appealable?
Sometimes - if a valid auth covered the services
Category
Authorization & Precertification
Common pairing
N54
On a remittanceCAS*CO*15*125.00On a paper EOB it shows as CO-15.

What CO-15 means

CO-15 means the claim's authorization number is the issue: it is blank, mistyped, expired, or does not cover the exact codes, dates, units, or rendering provider billed. It differs from CO-197, where no authorization was obtained at all. Usually a valid authorization exists - the fix is getting the correct number onto a corrected claim so it matches what was approved.

Common causes

  • The authorization number was left off or mistyped on the claim.
  • The auth on file doesn't match the billed CPT/HCPCS, units, dates, or rendering provider.
  • The authorization expired before the date of service.
  • The auth number was in an invalid format for the payer.

How to fix it

  • Locate the correct, active authorization and confirm it covers the billed services, dates, units, and provider.
  • Add or correct the authorization number and resubmit a corrected claim.
  • If a valid auth was present, contact the payer with the auth details and request reprocessing.
  • If services exceeded what was authorized, request an amended or additional authorization.

How to prevent it

  • Capture and verify the authorization number and its scope before the service.
  • Confirm the auth matches the planned codes, units, dates, and provider.
  • Carry the auth number through to the claim automatically from your authorization-tracking workflow.
Sometimes - if a valid auth covered the servicesUsually resolved by adding the correct authorization number to a corrected claim. Appeal when a valid authorization existed and covered the services - submit the auth details and request reprocessing.

Appeal letter template

Fill in the bracketed fields, attach your supporting documentation, and send through the payer's appeal channel. This is a starting point — adjust to your payer's requirements.

Appeal letter template
Re: Authorization Number Correction/Appeal (CO-15) - Claim [Claim Number]

Patient: [Patient Name]   |   Member ID: [Member ID]
Date(s) of Service: [DOS]   |   Service(s): [CPT/HCPCS]

To Whom It May Concern:

Claim [Claim Number] was denied under CO-15 for a missing or invalid authorization number. Authorization [Auth Number], approved on [Auth Date], covers [CPT/HCPCS] for [DOS] under rendering provider [Provider/NPI]. The authorization details are enclosed.

We request that the claim be reprocessed with this authorization on file.

Sincerely,
[Your Name], [Practice Name]   |   [Phone]   |   [NPI/TIN]

Plain-English explanation authored by Medmio. The CO-15 code meaning reflects the standard CARC/RARC set maintained by X12 and CMS; Medmio does not reproduce X12's official descriptor text verbatim. Codes change up to three times per year — verify active status against the latest X12/CMS release. For official Medicare remittance-code guidance, see CMS. Educational guidance only, provided as-is with no guarantee of accuracy or outcome — not a substitute for professional billing, coding, or legal advice.
Last reviewed: May 2026

Prevent denials like CO-15 before they happen.

Medmio pairs AI-powered coding with full revenue-cycle visibility, so coding-driven denials get caught before the claim goes out. See what that looks like for your practice.